(by Dan Peterson sic et non blog)
Some of you are probably already famliar with a website, Mormon Scholars Testify, that I launched roughly a decade ago. If you aren’t, I hope that you’ll take a look at it:
I probably need to modify the website’s title in the wake of President Russell M. Nelson’s admonitions regarding the nickname Mormon, but I haven’t gotten around to doing so. Truth be told, I’ve let the project pretty much glide for the past several years, owing to lack of time. (Every single entry on it was solicited and/or accepted by me and edited by me — thankfully, Tanya Spackman generously did the actual posting and the initial creation of the site — and I’ve simply been busy.) But there’s a lot of very good material on it, and I hope to get back to it again. (If anybody wants to help with the effort, I would be very grateful!)
In any event, I want to call particular attention at the moment to the Mormon Scholars Testify entry from John E. Clark, which, having been posted in 2011, is one of the relatively early pieces on the site. Professor Clark is a highly respected Mesoamerican archaeologist and — this is highly relevant to the critical sniping that my mention of him here is likely to provoke — one of the most bluntly honest and frank people I’ve ever encountered. He doesn’t cut corners or fudge the data. So his testimony, which almost inescapably touches upon the Book of Mormon, is significant:
John E. Clark
Also from Professor Clark, this 2005 presentation at the annual FairMormon conference:
“Debating the Foundations of Mormonism: The Book of Mormon and Archaeology”
And here is a related item from Jeff Lindsay:
“Evaluating Book of Mormon Claims: Where Do We Stand after 187 Years?”
You might also find this piece, which comes by way of the invaluable Irish Latter-day Saint Robert Boylan, to be of interest:
“Robert F. Smith on Moroni’s Appearances and Jewish Festivals”
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterson/2019/11/archaeology-and-the-book-of-mormon.html
No comments:
Post a Comment